I thoroughly enjoyed reading chapters 1 and 8 in our class textbook. All I could think about is why didn't my teachers use these strategies when I was in school? Oh, how much more engaging and fun would school have been for me. The ideas that continued to pop into my head while reading chapter 1 was memories of last semester. My Intermediate Block experience was one of excitement, new ideas, group collaboration, fun & helpful strategies and techniques, and fun learning. It was an extremely busy semester, but made so enjoyable because we were learning and using the different strategies mentioned in this chapter. I felt like I had a role in each and every class because my teachers set out to make this the objective. Using reciprocal teaching, JigSaw, think-pair shares, and many more were all strategies that made my learning rich. Why do teachers think that fun exercises, group work, and strategies are only for children? I think this should be a method of teaching that is required by all teachers, at all grade levels. I do not think anyone is ever too old to have fun with learning and incorporating fun group work like this is just the right way to motivate and engage students!
Chapter 8 reminded me of another college class I took years ago, Creative Writing. The main goal of this class was to make learning fun. So many times children, and adults are afraid to write because they think it will not be good or right. Making writing a natural part of life and school, without all the expectations of perfection all the time can be very beneficial to students. Doing this has the power of creating a WRITER with NO LIMITS. There must be a starting point and this is a perfect place to start. Writing for fun should always be encouraged. It gives freedom to the individual, and opens paths that, even to them, are unknown. I loved the creative writing class and have to say; I have thought about taking it again just for fun. My teacher would give us promts, like discussed in the chapter, and have us do quick writes. At first this was hard because I wanted it to be perfect so I struggled to just write to write. However, after a little time and coaching from my teacher, I learned to be creative and have fun with words. She would even do this with speaking. When I started her class, I had a fear of speaking in public, hard to believe I know :-) but after a few times of being given a topic and directed to speak...I quickly overcame this and actually began to love it! I learn so much about myself during that time, and it was all through the power of writing.
Before ending this Blog, I would like to share a few of my thoughts about the Student Think Center. I had never even heard of the place before Dr. Bishop mentioned it and really did not know what to expect. When I walked into the center I was WOWED. The openness, the bright colors (and this includes the BRIGHT WHITE), the sunlight, the big windows, the cool chairs and couches, and the awesome ladies all expressed me immensely! The center was warm and inviting, but not warm as in a coffee shop where the lights are dim and colors are dark and bright. This was warm welcoming and friendly atmosphere that felt clean and neat. I enjoyed the presentation and speaker/audience interaction. Also, I thought it was really cool the way they focused on so much detail in the design of the room in order to enhance thinking and learning. I personally have to have things a certain way if I plan on being productive with my work and getting anything done. I cannot have clutter because then my mind feels cluttered. I also need lots and lots of bright light, preferably natural sunlight, to make me feel alive, vibrant, and motivated. This center oozed all of the above and much more. The two ladies in the Student Think Center were very sweet, positive, and easy to get along with. They did not judge, look down on anyone, or act as though anyone was a burden, which are all attitudes one can find when walking into a place like this. My experience was excellent and I can not wait to go back to pick their brains on "thinking and learning," not to mention just to enjoy the awesome environment up there :-)
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Saturday, February 4, 2012
Content Literacy in the Elementary Grades and Design Thinking
The article Making a Case and a Place for Effective Content Area Literacy
Instruction in the Elementary Grades, by Barbara Moss was a fantastic
research article about incorporating informational text into the early
elementary classroom to promote “reading to learn.” I am of firm belief that schools do not think
of student education in a whole sense. Learning
should be like building blocks. Once in
school, the building process needs to begin.
So many schools, past and present, do not begin focusing on the
important skills of literacy until children become older and get into the higher
grades. This leaves our children
unprepared for what is to come and without the necessary skills and tools to critically
read and analyze information. This
article is designed to show the importance of teaching students to “read to
learn” at the earliest age/grade possible.
How are we to expect our students to understand, comprehend, synthesize,
and analyze information when they get to the higher grades if they are not
teaching and learning process has not begun at an earlier grade? This is impossible unless the student is
extremely gifted and has taught their self, which is more unlikely than
likely. As educators, our main objective
should be to prepare our students for higher levels of education and life. This preparation needs to begin at the earliest
age possible to improve the students’ success rate.
Kindergarten is where this should begin,
as stated in the article. There needs to
be a shift from narrative text to informational text. It is the teacher’s duty to teach the
students how to not only read the text, but pull information from and learn
from it as well. This can be done using
many strategies such as, modeling and think-alouds. Research shows that children, especially
boys, prefer reading informational text over narrative text. Children want to learn, and what better way
to feed this curiosity and need for new knowledge than with expository
text. There needs to be a shift in thinking by our educators. One than goes from looking at kindergarteners and lower elementary students as babies that are incapable of reading, working, and understanding complex problems and texts, to one where they strive to teach and guide these children to be able to read, work, and understand complex ideas. Education does not start in upper elementary or middle school. It goes from kindergarten to twelfth grade. By shifting the focus to education for ALL ages, our students will have a much higher chance of graduating and leaving our school systems as successful critical thinkers.
Literacy is not only reading and writing. There are many components to literacy, and I feel that these were left out of this article, but should be held in just as high of a regard, especially speaking. It is not until the end of the article when Inquiry Based Learning is mentioned and speaking (and other literacy components) is even mentioned. I think this is as important as reading to learn because what the end goal should be for teachers is to create a student that is well-rounded in all areas of literacy. Is speaking not as important as reading to learn? Some may say it is not; however, I think is as important for our students to be effective communicators, debaters, speakers, etc…as it is to read to learn.
How do we create a learning environment that is literacy rich in all areas? We do this by designing our lessons to incorporate ALL aspects of literacy. By starting in the kindergarten classroom and moving up each grade, our students will never feel an enormous sense of frustration because content literacy is familiar to them. The information will become progressively harder, but they will have the knowledge and tools to understand, comprehend, and solve any new problem with the guidance of their teacher. If this shift was made, I think our “fourth-grade drop” would soon be erased because students will not be thrown into a grade, which to them is like the first day of their school career.
This research needs to be known and
followed by educators nationwide, but how do we make such a drastic change in
the schools? The truth is this matter is
not drastic, but to many it will be viewed as so because many people fear
change. Teachers get used to doing the
same thing year after year and become closed-minded in their beliefs and
practices. What needs to be looked at is
the big picture of learning and how this process works. This transformation of schools will happen,
but will take the motivation, passion, and drive of progressive teachers taking
a stand and fighting for change and then making the results known to all.
I have noticed, during my practicum, many teachers introducing informational texts at a very early grade level. I wonder if this is because of the shift from the MS Frameworks to the Common Core Standards? When teachers follow common core, they are supposed to introduce narrative texts and informational texts at a 50/50 ratio. I am so glad this is becoming a major issue and is actually going to soon be required by all. This will help turn our education system around in a very positive way, and aid in preparing students for all grades and life!
On a final note, when reading about the learning logs I realized they are like our blogs. Having students reflect on what they have learned is a great tool for facilitating metacognition in students. There is something about reflecting and writing through a blog that makes the experience much more exciting, fun, and less tedious. Way to go, Dr. Bishop….you’re making learning fun! :-)
I have noticed, during my practicum, many teachers introducing informational texts at a very early grade level. I wonder if this is because of the shift from the MS Frameworks to the Common Core Standards? When teachers follow common core, they are supposed to introduce narrative texts and informational texts at a 50/50 ratio. I am so glad this is becoming a major issue and is actually going to soon be required by all. This will help turn our education system around in a very positive way, and aid in preparing students for all grades and life!
On a final note, when reading about the learning logs I realized they are like our blogs. Having students reflect on what they have learned is a great tool for facilitating metacognition in students. There is something about reflecting and writing through a blog that makes the experience much more exciting, fun, and less tedious. Way to go, Dr. Bishop….you’re making learning fun! :-)
In Betty
Ray’s blog on Design Thinking, she lays out the process for collaboration,
brainstorming in order solve problems.
When using design thinking, small groups of people get together to work
through the steps. In these meetings
there are rules to follow. One of these
rules being to say “yes, and” instead of “yes, but” when disagreeing with
someone in the group. This keeps the
communication positive and opens the minds of others more. I love this idea and am going to try to use
it in my everyday life. I am very
opinionated and do not have any problems speaking what is on my mind,
especially if I feel it is for the betterment of someone; however, this can be
seen as overbearing and negative. Always
opening a disagreeing statement without the negative I can see as being very
beneficial. Often if someone perceives
the words are going to be negative or/and if the words are in disagreement with
a previous statement, then others are more likely to close off and not listen
to what is being said. When I am selling
something I never use negative statements, even if what I am saying truly is in
fact negative. I do not let the other
person know this, and am able to mask it by tailoring my words to sound
positive. I do not do this in everyday
communication or when collaborating with peers. Working to state things in a positive manner
will be a goal of mine after reading this blog. I wonder how this would look in the classroom
when teaching students. I think this
would create a positive learning environment, but how does a teacher do this
with students?
Design
thinking is a great process that involves many different people from the
school, the community, parents, and students.
This process can be used for anything when trying to solve a
problem. I think this builds a sense of
community with the students and families and is a great tool that should be
used to solve problems as a whole, while also teaching the students
lessons. How time consuming is this process though? I do not think it matters how time consuming this process is when it is a classroom project; however, when it is one where multiple people are involved then it seems as though there might be issues with time. To
me it seems as though it might be extremely difficult to get all the people
needed together at one time for collaboration.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)